About your Search

English 53
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 53 (some duplicates have been removed)
is that while afghanistan is very important to us, we should not and will not desert it the way we did 20 years ago. we have scaled back a lot. if the wrong person is elected, and the wrong political process in sues, there are no guarantees. there are no guarantees, and the afghans should not have any guarantee of our commitment. if they are trumped by the presidential process that is correct, then i think all bets are off. and i make this argument with some reluctance, because i am to agree arguing against those who say this, but that it is a lot recker gives us maybe 10% to 20% less to make afghanistan succeed. it is a hard argument to make. the taliban could come back. it does matter to us a lot. but we should not think that if the afghans in a terrible decisions that we can rescue them. i think it is worth trying to get that message through. >> 2.5 minutes for the hardest question of the day. ok. on the first issue about the british, there was a period where they seemed to be operating on its own. there is a pretty tied together strategy. i am really pretty impressed right now. i do not thi
this process leads us. >> the term the deputy attorney general used is at least $175 million. >> you were there on monday wondering how you think your attorneys are doing. can you explain our summarize why this case is so important? >> the case is pending and it is really inappropriate for me to comment during a pending case. our pleadings will continue to do the talking for us. it is my understanding closing arguments will occur tomorrow and the case will be submitted to the court. we will continue to vigorously enforce section 5 and other provisions of the voting rights act. >> why did you bring the case in the first case? >> we fought our objection with the state of texas, we concluded that they had not met their burden of establishing the absence of discriminatory purpose and discriminatory intent. that is what the trial is about. the burden is on the state. we are presenting our case and the state is presenting bears. the intervenors are presenting bears and the court will soon speak on this issue. >> one more question. >> there have been reports in the last month or so that governme
refuse to do anything about it, but we allow political bullies to intimidate us from even researching the facts. now, there's never been a threat in this country that sportsmen will not be able to hunt or target shoot. that false specter raised by the gun lobby so successfully that dade there is virtually no gun protection. but that doesn't stop the number one gun advocacy group, the national rifle association, from making things up, creating phony threats to gun ownership. they are attacking the obama administration which has done essentially nothing in this field. since they know that congress would reject even the most reasonable proposal. it has been impossible, for example, to even -- to close the gun show loophole where people can get unlimited amounts of guns without a reasonable background check. the n.r.a. is at work to make sure people on the no-fly list because they are threats to national security can purchase guns. that data cannot be shared between a.t.f. and homeland security dealing with potential terrorists. the n.r.a. argues that all we need is for existing gun laws
, get to the work that the american people sent us here for and understand and was quoted this morning by one of our colleagues, our time is very precious. don't waste it by playing got you games. think about what we discussed earlier. mr. polis and i will debate this rule and we will do it -- yes, a second mistake was made. we acknowledge that. we accept it. now we'd like to get on to the people's business. mr. frank: the fact that we put aside tragedy doesn't mean we -- and this is not simply a small mistake but it is a small mistake in a bill that's about as bipartisan as it gets. to make a plea of bipartisanship with this excessively bipartisan bill that is put through with major concerns about every aspect of the federal government given 10 minutes of debate at 9:00 and 10:00 at night to be voted on, that's a mistake. as the gentleman from new jersey and i pointed out, this is not simply a mistake was made but a mistake that would have easily been caught earlier if people caught the bill. and i stress this because when we did some of the other legislation, financial reform, health
in chief he has the obligation to help us to solve this problem. i ask our colleagues to please support this legislation. bring transparency. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from maryland is recognized. mr. van hollen: thank you, madam speaker. i listened carefully to what the chairman of the armed services committee said, and i didn't find much that i disagree with. we agree that we should replace the sequester. we agree that it's a mistake to create the kind of uncertainty that's out there, and obviously it has an impact not just in the defense sector, but also in all the other areas where our federal government has activities. but i would just say, and i want to make sure the chairman's on the floor now and has a chance to respond, he demonstrated some leadership on this issue. last fall, because he was asked this question, he was asked if he had to put together a plan that included some revenue, he said, yeah. i understand we got to make cuts, but i'd rather include some revenue than deep cuts to defense. in fact, what he said was,
here to show you appreciate what women have been doing to break down the barriers for all of us, and you are here to celebrate women, we thank you. [applause] >> it is independence day, and coming up next on c-span, a panel of medal of honor winners gathered at the reagan library in california to show the lessons that apply to the youth today. and then a discussion of the future of the internet. and then billy jean king on equal opportunity and pay for women athletes. >> bartoli strip makes the togo look -- topa bill topato cqueville simple by comparison. he tore the countryside and he wanted to understand what makes americans tic. he was surprised by what americans saw. he had read that americans were individualistic and he saw us as much more collectivist. it seems hard for us to imagine that, but he saw the united states as a group of people who like to form associations, who wanted to always be with other people. after you went to the u.s., he saw the french as the individualist and the americans as the more social people. and from that, he concluded that he was going to put
, walking thru row after row of crosses in the sand at santa monica beach. as of today, 2,041 u.s. soldiers have been killed in afghanistan and over 12,000 have been wounded. while many of us talk about these figures here on the house floor, i know many of us have even more personal experiences with families who have suffered loss or illnesses or injuries of their loved ones. fortunately, i've been to walter reid twice -- unfortunately, i've been to walter reid twice in the last six months and seen the sacrifices we're asking these young men and women to bear. i think all of us should take the time to walk the halls of walter reid and see the full cost this has taken my own cousin a young man of 26, was only in afghanistan six months when he was shot in the leg. it's unclear if he'll get full recovery of his leg. i visited one of my former employees, whose son ben was in afghanistan, re-enlisted three times to go back. unfortunately, this last time, he has lost now both of his legs. his future, his family's future, has changed forever. you know when you walk the halls at walter reed, you're
't for the mining interests in america, you wouldn't have those gadgets because that's what goes into what we use. we need to be able to use america's resources, the 42 mining operations in baker county, if they were allowed to work -- these are individual -- these are just average americans just trying to do what they are allowed to do under federal law but held up because of the federal agency's inability to get their work done, or unwillingness to in the north fork and burt river and elsewhere. if they could just move forward, get an answer out of the federal government something short of 10 or 11 years, they could be producing jobs, mineral resource, and wealth for this country, america. the united states of america. we could create jobs here using our resources, our mineral resources. some of these people have died waiting. you shouldn't have to die waiting for your federal government to get its work done. that's why we need this bill. i yield back the balance of my time. . the chair: the gentleman from massachusetts. mr. markey: can i ask how much time remains? the chair: the gentleman from
propose us pretty much starting over the whole system again, getting rid of the fed and basically one of the other points i want to make is -- host: we'll finish with that is there a federal reserve role in all this? . guest: if they are complaining about china, they are diverting people from the real problem which are that problems are here in washington, d.c., that spends too much and regulates too much. >> the house is gaveling in for legislative work. five bills are scheduled for today, including authorization for state department programs in 2013. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from arkansas, mr. griffin, and the gentleman from florida, mr. deutch, each will control 20 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from arkansas. mr. griffin: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous materials on s. 1959, as amended, currently under consideration. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. griffin: mr. speaker, yumeds. -- i yield myself such time as
will not tolerate health care fraud. and in every instance where we uncover it, we will use all of our available tools to help -- to hold those responsible to account. before i turn over the podium to our next speaker, i want to read knowledge our colleagues and partners at a part of health and human services. -- the department of health and human services. the federal bureau of investigation, the federal drug control unit, and of our federal and state partners who have made valuable contributions to this effort. i would also like to thank karman ortiz, the ditch attorney for the state of massachusetts, who -- the district attorney for the state of massachusetts, who has done an enormous amount to make this effort possible in a longstanding commitment to eradicating health care fraud. i also want to thank john walsh, the district attorney of kalla rudder, and his office, for their significant -- of colorado, and his office, for their significant contributions to this effort. and finally, the civil efforts in advance in this investigation and other important ones like it. it is now my pleasure to
pitfalls that lie ahead. host: richard ravitch, thank you for joining us. guest: my pleasure. host: that is all for "washington legislative business includes the preserving of america family firms act. a communication from the speaker. the clerk: the speaker's rooms, washington, d.c. july 24, 2012. i hereby appoint the the honorable david rivera, to act as speaker pro tempore on this day, signed, john a. boehner, speaker of the house of representatives. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the order of the house of january 17, 2012, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour debate. the chair will alternate recognition between the parties with each party limited to one hour and each member other than the majority and minority leaders and minority whip limited to five minutes each. but in no event shall debate continue beyond 11:50 a.m. the chair recognizes the gentleman from texas, mr. poe, for five minutes. mr. poe: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: wit
are on a path that would have taken us about 6% below peak year spending, fiscal year 2010. historically budgets go down by 30% in build down times. while it may not be a strictly partisan difference, we do have a disjoint right now between where we have typically gone with defense cuts and where we presently are. i would note that the pressures on this are a lot deeper than just the budget control act. that's occupying a lot of attention right now, but two things are underlying it. the first is we are ending the wars. again that was something the administration at the pentagon stressed but our respondents seemed to favor in their spending decision, and also the debt reduction is important irrespective of the legislative vehicle that enacts it. the simpson-bowles debt reduction commission both saw $4 trillion of either revenue increase or spending cut needed in order to get our fiscal position in a stable spot, budget control act is a $2.1 trillion measure. which means that in all likelihood something is going to come after it. you are going to have to have something that will substitute for see
to center craig crapo. senate >> the u.s. economy continues to face significant challenges with the eurozone, a tax cliff, and our broader fiscal crisis which includes the need to address the impending solvency of the entitlement programs. a disappointing 8000 jobs were added in june, holding unemployment steady at 8.20. he warned congress what would happen if it did not address the fiscal cliff. knowing that this would have a significant impact on the recovery. according to cbo, if all the tax and spending measures under current law were to occur together, the economy would grow at just 0.5% compared to 4.4% expectation absent to these investors. one of the largest private owners of u.s. debt said we have until 2016 to contain our borrowing before bond investors dried up interest rates. others suggest the timetable could be much sooner. the lack of economic growth has some to call for further expansion of the $2.90 trillion balance sheet through a third round of quantitative easing. there are a lot of questions about how effective the first two rounds of quantitative easing has been, what t
on traditional loyalties. they are plugged into every major security. then they use tried and village affiliations -- tried and village affiliations, and ultimately the different sects. at the core of the success of the assad's was making the alliance with a series. that has unraveled only recently with defections at high levels. there are other logics going on, but at heart, it is sectarian and that is driving this. the sunnis are slowly abandoning the regime and the minority that is left is being stripped down to the basic core of these traditional loyalties prevent when they are completely stripped down, the regime will fall precipitously. but it will take time. and frankly, they are frightened. there their backs to the walls and they have nowhere to go. they're going to fight. like the christians and lebanon, like the palestinians. like the sunnis. they do not know what the alternative is and they have convinced themselves they face a bleak future. that is why no major minority figures from inside syria have defected so far. that may come, but it has not yet. was that heess relied
illness is important. what we learned from this program could help us in other programs of diseases coming from iraq and afghanistan. if you get a chance to visit walter reed bethesda hospital see some very strange viruses and molds and funguses that are coming from places that we never expected to see but we're seeing them now. this research program could help another research program to deal with these deadly diseases that are affecting our troops in large numbers. and so while we already give $10 million in this bill, i am going to agree with mr. kucinich and agree to his amendment to add the additional money. mr. dicks: if the gentleman will yield? mr. young: i do. mr. dicks: this gulf war illness has been something that bothered me a great deal. it's a very difficult diagnosis on what was causing this, but i think an additional investment here is worthy and i think we should accept the amendment. i'm glad the chairman accepts it. mr. young: i thank the gentleman for his comments and thank mr. kucinich for offering the amendment and i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the q
. the bank says to us, who is going to -- what customer of ours in west texas is going to wade through 100 or even 20 pages? host: this is from one of our viewers. dodd-frank is typical of what happens when the private sector misbehaves. guest: that is true. regulation is reactive. it is like you are fighting the last war. whitneys' to happen is set of incentives so financial institutions and other entities have been sentenced to be responsive to customers rather than to bureaucrats that they know they can charm. host: you can send us a, on our twitter page, join the conversation. you can also email's. good morning come independent line. caller: i think he explained it good. this is relative to the corruption between wall street and washington. this has been all over the internet about things happening, nothing being done about it. you have all of these corruption scenarios going on. congress says, we did not see it. they do not see it until the taxpayers have to pay for it. host: thank you for the call. tony says, is it true dodd-frank has generated a fourth of 13,000 pages of regulation?
and discussion on defense appropriations. they will be coming in in just a minute. thank you for joining us today on "washington journal." [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] from government was there in the wee hours of the morning when we were doing our regular jobs at the same time working to start our business. small businesses operate in a world of bottom lines washington knows very little about. unlike washington, they don't have the luxury to deficit spend, print more money or profess as, quote, spending cuts, lower than anticipated growth. when the president claimed the american system allowed the askess to thrive, he made a dangerous -- allowed the success to thrive, he made a dangerous error. it does not permit them to drive. that language suggests government is a benefactor possessing the authority to give or take the blessings of open commerce as it sees fit. no, government does not allow you to thrive. government, when it operates in its constitutional capacity, does not object -- obstruct your thriving. ask
with nations around the world. he delivered remarks at the u.s. institute of peace on a new defense strategy that focuses on a greater strategic interest on the capability of others to help meet security challenges and the future. yes a spoke about the need to invest in future capabilities such as cyber securities. -- he also spoke about the need to address in future capabilities such as a cyber security. >> good afternoon. we are delighted you are with us for a special presentation. i am the president of the institute. to start the evening off -- it is my special pleasure to welcome the chairman of the board of the institute of peace, robin west. [applause] >> thank you, dick. i am robin west, chairman of the board of directors for the institute of peace. good evening, and welcome to the acheson lecture. this is the fifth lecture. we welcome you to the george shultz great hall of the headquarters of the u.s. institute of peace. this building symbolizes our belief that peace is restoring hope of humanity. it is located on the national mall. it is a statement of how we want to see ourselves i
. this cooperative endeavor between the u.s. fish and wildlife service, the ventana wild society, in coalition with the condor recovery team have done well on recovery efforts and public education. many come to this region to get an opportunity to see the condor in the wild. this legislation has broad support from our counties of san benito and monterrey as well as the chamber of commerce, visitor bureau as well as counties who are enthusiastically supportive of this legislation. there is no opposition to the bill. . pinnacles is located in coastal california to attract thousands of visitors each year which provide a vie that the -- vital economic engine for the county. increasing the number of tourists would promote a healthy impact for those in the retail sector and dining and lodging opportunities the new national park designation would strengthen the region's tourism potential. research shows for every $1 invested in our national park, they return $4 to the community in tourism dollars. situated slightly inland from the california coast, pinnacles national monument has not yet realized its
at the u.s. house of representatives where members will take a number of issues including the ongoing debate about sequestration and with votes expected later in the day. also on capitol hill, ben bernanke testifies. the speaker pro tempore: the house will be in order. the chair lays before the house a communication from the speaker. the clerk: the speaker's rooms, washington, d.c. july 18, 2012. i hereby appoint the honorable jean schmidt to act as speaker pro tempore on this day, signed, john a. boehner, speaker of the house of representatives. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the order of the house of january 17, 2012, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour debate. the chair will alternate recognition between the parties with each party limited to one hour and each member other than the majority and minority leaders and minority whip limited to five minutes each, but in no event shall the debate continue beyond 11:50 a.m. the chair now recognizes the gentleman from oregon, mr. blumenauer, for five minutes.
? >> i will say the way i get news is i use my twitter account to get almost all the news i get. for many people, especially young people, that is a cool way to do it. i find because i used my twitter stream -- i set up a specific group of people i follow for breaking news, and it has been built over several years, and it's really large at this point -- the point being i find i am a good 25 minutes ahead of people on breaking news because i am on twitter. i checked but other sources. that is my favorite way to follow news, and it feels the same as the shift when i was in newspapers. i was the only person reading blogs in the newsroom. twitter can serve the same purpose. can be fast and wrong, sorry you need to check. if you are a news junkie, that is my favorite thing. i also love "the wall street journal," fox is. i like to watch my own cliffs. hotair.com, because i work there now. the george mason university economists have their own blogs. a woman who works at newsweek -- i love reading her. aside from news, i like reading more analytical, wonky stuff. everybody done? since we are on c
pays for your health care. there has been a study showing how much that dilution costs us. it concluded that the income we lose because our employers taking part of our paid to purchase our health insurance, part of the premium we pay in addition to that, the taxes we pay and our out of pocket costs, the average american family pays $25,000 per year for the illusion that we get free health care. >> essentially, there's a reason for insurance, to protect against catastrophic costs. if you have a heart attack or cancer, you cannot just pay the doctor or the surgery. it is just like homeowners insurance or life insurance or any other insurance. when you prepare routine costs of front, you are paying the insurance company to do it. >> i'm a retired army physician. from your point of view and for your adversaries on the left, when all the dust settles, whatever and wins, what will happen to the military medical care system which includes the hospitals run by the uniformed services as well as the va system? >> i am glad you brought this up. it is little appreciated that one of the fastest-gr
, sent each of us a letter with a "time" magazine cover by joel kind entitled "how to die." this article is jarring to many because it's an issue that most would rather not confront. as a result, there's a great deal of unnecessary pain, confusion and suffering. it masks one of the most important issues in health care which, despite the manufactured controversy over death panels, is a rare sweet spot in the health care debate. it can improve the quality of life, in some cases length of life, and most important, we can help people understand their circumstances and get the care that they want. if this happens, the cost of health care will go down even as satisfaction and quality goes up. for most americans, the protocols followed by almost every hopped and practitioner will be to give the maximum amount of the most aggressive care in end of life situation, especially if patients have the money or insurance, they will be hooked up in their final stages of life to be resuscitated, cracking their ribs, massaging hearts. there will be tubes inserted, chemicals will be pumped, defibrillators w
were individualistic and he actually saw us as much more collectivist. it seems kind of hard for us to imagine that. he saw the united states as a group of people who like to form associations, who wanted to always be with other people. he told the french -- after he went to the united states, he saw the french as individual list and the americans as more social people. from that, he concluded that if he was going to put up this colossal statue, it would have to say something to people who understood themselves as a big group, and society, a kind of collective entity. >> you can watch this whole event as part of our prime time lineup. it also includes a discussion on how social media has changed news coverage, and commencement speeches from mayor cory booker -- starting at 8:00 eastern on c-span. now, a congressional gold medal ceremony for the first african- american marines known as the montford point marines -- about 19,000 were stationed at a segregated camp in north carolina. speaking at the ceremony included house speaker john boehner, minority leader nancy pelosi, and senate
the following, section, not later than 30 days after a contract is awarded using funds appropriated under this act, the relevant contractor and subcontractor at any year and any principal with 10% ownership interest, officer or director of the contractor or subcontractor or any affiliate or subsidiary within the control of the contractor or subcontractor shall disclose to the administrator of general services all communications, independent expenditures or contributions made in the most recent election cycle supporting or opposing a federal political candidate, local party or political committee and contributions made to a third party with the intention or reasonable expectation that such entity would use the contribution to make independent expenditures or election communications in federal elections. . the chair: the gentleman from minnesota is recognized for five minutes. mr. ellison: mr. chairman, representative eshoo and i have submitted this very straightforward amendment for a very simple reason. we believe that it's simply fair and it's good for public disclosure to require defens
intended. chairman dodd acknowledged that the language was intended to exempt those entities that use them to hedge or mitigate commercial risk. regulators have read the statute otherwise and have issued regulations that do in fact require margin from non- financial and users. they take the position that it was the exact language still bound by. because of that, i introduced legislation to correct that and make it clear there is an exemption for non -- for the end users. when he was before the banking committee recently, i asked this question to chairman bernanke -- would it be appropriate for us to correct that language and provide an exemption for non- financial and users so that it is clear that is what statutory language requires? >> i do not think you need to do that. the way the statute was designed, you gave flexibility and discretion to the regulators to try to achieve the objective you laid out. i think the concern is if you opened this up too much, you will let the exception undermined critical safeguards over financial institutions that the law was intended to cover. i cannot th
i guess if i had one regret i guess it only took us two years to get here. but better let than never, senator mikulski, so tomorrow is another day. on a more personal note, i lost both my sisters to breast cancer. my only two sisters. . at a fairly young age. when my older sister died and we went to her funeral, her younger sister, sylvia, was there, and had no idea that she also had breast cancer. within two years she was dead also. and they left young families. they lived in rural areas, small towns. they didn't have any money. they didn't really have health care coverage. for them to go to get a checkup would have cost money. money that they could ill afford at that time. -- at that time. they had a number of kids. as i said they didn't have a lot of money. they didn't have health care benefits. it would have been different if they could have had this available to them. early checkups, early screenings. for both of them it was way too late by the time they discovered it. so this has a very personal, poignant meaning to me. i just hope that women in this country now will take
"magazine . thank you joining us. don't forget the house of representatives will vote on repeal of the affordable care act are you can stay tuned and watch that. stay tuned) are website, c- span.org, for all the activities we will run today when it comes to campaign 2012 issues. the website is c-span.org and the houses in at 10:00 and there just about to come in now so we will go to the house of representatives. h[captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker: the house will be in order. pursuant to the order of the house of january 17, 2012, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour debate . the chair
of rights allows an airman to appeal his or her case in the either the u.s. district court or circuit court of appeals. it is the intent of congress that courts not act in a way that is contrary to civil aviation safety and con-- in conducting their review of the ntsb's decisions. lastly, the pilot's bill of rights requires the f.a.a. to improve the system of providing notices to airmen and to undertake an assessment of the medical certification standards and forms. . the outdated medical certification process can lead to confusion and ultimately an f.a.a. than forcement proceeding. i rise in support of s. 1335 and urge my colleagues to do the same and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. the gentleman from illinois is recognized. >> i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. >> i rise in support of s. 1335, pile's -- pilot's bill of rights. i thank everyone for bringing the bill to the floor. it revises the process for the federal aviation administration enforcement a
romney is speaking. i am very sorry. simon wilson, we appreciate your being with us today. guest: thank you. host: that's all for washington journal. calle[captions copyright nationl cable satellite corp. 2012] >> american families are struggling. these numbers understate what people are feeling and the amount of pain occurring in middle-class america. not only is the 8.2% no. unacceptable and one that has been in place now over 41 months, in addition if you look at the broader analysis of people who are out of work or dropped out of the work force or that are underemployed in part- time jobs, leading full-time work, it's almost 15% of the american public. if a number of those that are working in jobs well beneath their skill level, working in multiple part-time jobs, kids that are coming out of college not being able to find work, veterans coming home not being able to do anything but stand in the unemployment line. if these are very difficult times for the american people. there are other troubling numbers. the manufacturing reports of the last several weeks indicate manufacturing is
. >> also markets that were funded of those blood bond markets? >> yes. mostly u.s. treasuries or european governments or japanese governments. >> in other words, when you arrived to set up barcap you have been living and breathing this for 17 years. >> the fixed-income government markets. >> the opportunity was to use the barclays treasury function to set up banking that use your ideas and experiences as you wanted? >> i would have said it slightly differently but there was an opportunity at barclays. barclays at that time was more of a u.k.-focused as opposed to international. >> i think i heard you saying that it was a sub-scale hiring people and did not pay them very much. the opportunity to change those things must have been exciting. >> they have scaled in the u.k. but it was impacting their ability to expand internationally. >> when you set up barcap, you are responsible directly for creating senior staff deciding which products you're focused on and markets around the world? those would have fallen under your experience? >> we would have gone to the board on any new projects or re
not my opinion, regulatory system is a kenard used by republicans to pursue an agenda supported by the business community year in and year out. nornede, it's a case of political opportumism. that's his opinion. not mine. my concern is if you ask economists on whether or not legislation -- many pieces of legislation that we baffed called jobs bills -- the gentleman has pointed that out -- economists say in the short term which is really what we need to do, we need to do in the short term and the long term is not going to create jobs. . this week we haven't done anything to create jobs. might i ask the gentleman, i didn't see it next week, do we expect the 32nd or 33rd vote on repealing the affordable care act either next week or week after or week after that? as the gentleman knows, c.b.s. opines we spent some 80 hours on that issue with whatever cost is attendant to that, do we -- you can answer both questions, i suppose, but certainly i would be interested and members would be interested to know whether or not we are going to have another vote on repealing the affordable care a
fact, the pelosi-led congress denied us a motion to recommit on 47 separate occasions. so i would say to the gentleman, again, the speaker has been consistent throughout. we intend to continue to strive towards an open process. we intend to offer you a motion to recommit, a stand-alone amendment if you want to offer a tax hike twice. that's our intention, yes, mr. speaker. mr. hoyer: i thank the gentleman, and i will interpret that, mr. speaker, as indicating that if we choose to offer as an amendment the bill that passed the senate, which ensures that there will be no tax increase on 98% of americans, that we would be allowed to offer that bill and it would be protected under the rule in such waivers that are necessary will be extended. that's how i interpret that. if i'm wrong, perhaps the majority leader can correct me. i don't want to -- parse words or lead to confusion. . i know what the senate bill is. and it is at this point in time our intention to offer that senate bill as an amendment to the bill that's offered on this floor. so i would hope that our understanding is con
of time the bank is so much for joining us this morning. they produce cc tv. jim laurie is from the operation in washington. that's all for "washington journal" this morning and tomorrow we will continue our series on foreigners operations in the u.s. with bbc america. you can catch the rest of our programs on this topic on our website, c-span.org. we will be back tomorrow morning at 7:00 eastern time and thank you for joining us today. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> president obama plans to talk about his economic policies. he won both states four years ago. we will have coverage of the president's first campaign stop today at 11:40 eastern. we will also be live as he wraps up the trip in pittsburgh tomorrow afternoon at 2:00 eastern. all the campaign stops will be live on c-span.org. the 2012 teacher of the year speaks today at the national education association. she teaches seventh grade in burbank, california. you can see your comments live at 11: 30 eastern on at c-span2. >> around 9:30, wo
competition. it is therefore essential for us to seize the initiative and education, innovation, technology, alternative energy, and advanced manufacturing. our leaders have secured. our economy will remain the strongest on earth. americans will continue to find good jobs and have confidence that they will make it in america. the key to success i believe is a renewed dedication to the kind of individual responsibility and commitment that made this country the great country that it is. america's history has been one of innovating and developing. better products and services. it has been a history in which manufacturing goods has played a major role. americans believe that making things in america must be an important part of our future if we're going to be successful. manufacturing has been a bright star in our current recovery. over the last three years we have seen strong gains by manufacturers. we witnessed 28 consecutive job growth months. manufacturing has added many jobs since 2010. productivity driven 6% in the first quarter of 2012. and gesture production is driven by reserves and ha
to the department of communication for sponsoring this. thank you to all of you for joining us here today. please join us for a reception right outside. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> president barack obama's bus tour of ohio and pennsylvania it is under way. at his first stop today, the president told the crowd the outcome of the november election will determine the nation's economic future for the next 10 to 20 years. here is a portion. >> when the american auto industry was on the brink of collapse, and more than one million jobs were on the line, governor romney said we should just let detroit go bankrupt. >> that's what he said! >> i refused to turn my back on communities like this one. i was betting on the american worker and i was betting on american industry. [applause] and three years later, the american auto industry is coming roaring back. [applause] that chrysler plant up the road bringing on another 1,100 employees to make the cars that the world wants to buy. the wrangler built right here in toledo
and a lot of places. you and i are right there. we are doing it. that see if we can make progress. -- let us see if we can make progress. i am going to call on this yen lady right here. we have to get a microphone to her. it is the icc. that is a good-looking young man. >> my father is an unemployed construction worker. he is on unemployment. will he have a job before his unemployment runs out? >> this is important. what is your name? >> taylor. >> it is so nice to me in. -- meet you. my hope is that we can put him to work. housing to the biggest hit. you have this big bubble that collapse. since september of last year i have urged congress to expand our efforts to rebuild roads, bridges, schools, making sure that all these folks like your father who want to work, and these are not folks that are looking for a handout. they want to be on the job so they have an opportunity that we're going to have to do anyway. this is important. how many folks here have a house and you know that you have a leaky roof? you can put off patching it up. sooner or later you will have to. sooner or later. if you
. it's called "funding the enemy," how u.s. taxpayers bankroll the taliban. that's the whole issue. we have defeated bin laden. he's dead. al qaeda has been disbursed all around the world, but we continue to fund a corrupt leader who will not survive in the long term, we all know that, but yet we are playing this little game of spend the american taxpayers' money to keep him in office and let's borrow the money from the chinese that we are spending, because that's the way it's happening, to keep karzai in office. 72% of the american people have agreed with most of us in the house, not all, it's time to bring our troops home. there's not one thing we are going to accomplish over that. mr. speaker, when i saw that, the national security agreement that the secretary of state and this administration have signed with afghanistan, what we are talking about is after 2014 we will continue to have a military presence of anywhere from 25,000 to 30,000. we are spending approximately $4 billion a month, that's probably a low ball figure, mr. speaker, but $4 billion a month for 10 years. that adds
occupations of all backgrounds. and they rely -- and this is an important thing for all of us to realize -- they rely on the participation of people throughout the country. the census bureau attains a very high partition rate -- participation rates, but it is important due. -- important they do. host: will move on to manufacturing the first take a call from mark from maine. caller: good morning, susan. thanks once again for a very informative "washington journal ." the complexity of these census charts certainly needs explanation. so, thank you, robert. i am coming from the older generation, the chart on home ownership. it is obvious we older people have had a lifetime to pay off our mortgages. but my question will probably raise the ire of some listeners. is there any sense of data on the elderly who do not need a social security? i started on social security at 62 as a retired public school teacher. and i still remember my depression parents raised in the depression is saying they didn't need social security because they saved, sad all through their life. and i was kind of raised that
and leave the rest of us suffering. host: thank you for the call this morning. when is the next survey coming out? guest: certain questions get asked every year and how they shift based on the economy. the idea it is not to have the one tical document w candidate or the other. host: you can find the survey and thank you so much for joining us. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] host: a nomination is taking place. you can see the hearings going on pretty soon in the senate foreign relations committee. thank you for joining us. we'll see you tomorrow. >> waiting for the senate foreign relations committee to gavel in. waiting for james cunningham and richard olson. thel be back covering subcommittee later this afternoon. living at the benefits of doing business in latin america with increased competition for china and the impact of the political environment in latin america. that will be on c-span3 this afternoon. the house will gavel in at noon for general speeches. 19 bills on the agenda today. back on c-span3
they could do it cheaper. give us a special model out there and launch it as a pilot and we'll show you how we can do these special programming and give us a return. well, after reviewing now what is a history of all of that, it was deemed that there were overpayments anywhere between 12% and 14%, so the dollars were slid over to programs like filling the doughnut hole and providing for screenings for our seniors. not taking it away from a category of health care consumers. in this case, an aged demographic of seniors, but taking those savings as we sweep those savings and reinvesting them in a way that provides balance, more sensitivity for the consumer rather than having record profits developed for an industry. to me that was progressive policy, and for people to then take those savings and use them in their own budget presentations for other purposes was disingenuous. now, when you talk about the efforts today of the affordable care act to include an exchange, what i think is oftentimes, representative garamendi, sometimes people see this as a public exchange that will be run by the gov
the state's by eliminating expectation of government bailouts, respond to the emerging threats of the u.s. financial system. how is the council doing? those are your three major goals. >> i would say it is a little early still. i will tell you what i think the main challenge is. we have a very complicated system of financial oversight that involved a lot of different agencies. they are writing a set of rules that are very complicated by a very -- by definition. we have an interest making sure they do that stuff carefully with all necessary speed but in a way where they are not treating new opportunities and incentives for people to move risk to where regulations are softer. the council, congress did not give council the authority to override the independent jurisdiction authority of those agencies. >> can you give us examples of measures to have taken to protect and ensure there are not any type of -- there are not any -- >> i think you have to look at the scale of changes that have been put in place in our system, not just the measures we took in the financial emergency but the reforms.
economy. we have differences in our tariffs. that causes us to borrow money. the light borrowing against the store. in host: i heard tariffs in those comments. is there a trade policy and are we playing on a level playing field? maybe you can pick up that point. >guest: one of the big issues in terms of trade policy is how the u.s. responds and crafts its relationship with china. as of last year, the senate passed a tough bill to clamp down on the chinese currency manipulation. china would not call of manipulation, obviously. the bill was in the house but it is opposed by the obama administration. they don't want to hurt their relationship with china and house republicans have no intention of bringing this up. on the other hand, mitt romney has said he will declare china a currency manipulator on the first day of his presidency. it is on clearview will follow through with that because there are real geopolitical consequences to that. that is something we are seeing in the campaign. host: back to the farm bill -- if there were an emergency measure, how would the politics of that play out?
process, that would be something that i think all of us could agree upon. but in the absence of that breakthrough medically i thank the gentleman for his bipartisan wishes of a happy birthday. mr. bishop: as someone with whiter hair than you have, i understand what you're talking about. let me yield three minutes if i could to the gentleman from california, mr. rohrabacher, who does indeed have some of these industries in his district and understands full well what this bill is actually attempting to accomplish. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from california is recognized for three minutes. mr. rohrabacher: i rise in support of the rule and rise in support of h.r. 4402. tomorrow we will be considering h.r. 4402, that takes significant steps towards making much-needed reforms to our nation's mineral exploration and mineral permitting process. h.r. 4402 will force the hands of unyielding bureaucrats who seem intent on obstructing any and all mining despite the detrimental effects that their actions have on the american people. at a time when china threatens to hamstring
of this country that uses energy. the failure for us to tap into our resources, to review and get a solid assessment on the amount of resources available to the american people is being missed here. so i certainly hope that members would reject the president's plan and take up our plan which is going to expand the amount of federal properties available to explore for oil and gas and lower the cost and create jobs for all americans. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. without objection, the gentleman from massachusetts will control the time. the gentleman from massachusetts. mr. markey: i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. markey: i thank the chair. mr. speaker, yesterday the majority brought to the floor a bill that would replace the interior department's five-year offshore drilling plan. today the majority is bringing a bill to the floor that would require the interior department to conduct the offshore drilling plan it is already doing. now, why would we be taking up a bill to replace the plan yes
over and over that he supports u.s. energy development. then we see that every opportunity he makes the choice to prevent efficient energy development from happening. we must do more for the american people in generating more energy for lower prices and less -- lessen our dependence on foreign oil. this bill does exactly that. i ask my colleagues to join me in voting for this bill. vote for american energy and american jobs. let's replace the president's do-nothing plan with a plan that moves america forward. thank you, mr. speaker, and i yield back. the chair: the gentleman from new jersey. >> i the thank the chair and i rise in opposition -- i thank the chair and i rise in opposition to this. i'd like to address a point the chairman made as he attempted to correct mr. markey and said that there have been a number of wind energy bills considered. i think we would gladly count those votes in the column of gutting the national environmental protection act. mr. holt: but wind, no. the wind industry did not support any of those bills that he was talking about or amendments. they are no
before us. we just do. so i am very thankful to of the gibson and the other guys around that time, too, that were very good to me -- i am very thankful to althea gibson. we are all in this together, so we have to help each other. >> what do you think has been the biggest change in the last 20 years? >> that was not very long ago. i think it has been an evolution of equipment change. this is really like. -- light. this is like my security blanket. what i told my dad i wanted to play tennis, my dad said, "show me." i went to my neighbors and beg them to give me a job. when i had $8.29 sit up in a mason jar, i said i could not wait any longer and i went to brown's sporting goods and got my first racket. the salesperson said to me, "what kind do you want?" i asked what a dollars and 29 cents would buy. i got it because i loved the color. it was my favorite color. i would sleep with it every night and dream about winning and being number one. so when i see this, i love it. just like blindness, you know, with your blankie -- just like linus. the biggest thing is the materials in the rackets
of us from michigan how much time there is on each side? the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin, has seven minutes remaining. the gentleman from michigan, mr. camp, has 9 1/2 minutes remaining. mr. levin: why don't i reserve and then you can move forward? the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin, reserves. the gentleman from michigan, mr. camp. mr. camp: i yield one minute to the gentleman from michigan, mr. huizenga. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from michigan is recognized for one minute. mr. huizenga: i appreciate my friend from michigan yielding time. i am a freshman. this is my first term in session here in congress, and i wasn't here for passage of this bill, but i can tell you i am here because the american people wanted change. they did not and will not accept what was passed by this previous congress. you are going to hear a lot today how it has helped people. we cannot go back to the status quo, but this is not the solution. this is not the way. and that's why i rise today in strong support of the repeal of the obamac
for over five years, and that is sherwood boller, many of us remember him fondly, and he says that it would be, and i quote, difficult to exaggerate the sweep and destructiveness of the house bill. be and that is referring to 4078. direction the agencies that were created to protect the public to close up shop. and then he goes on to say, quote, there's no indication that this bill would have job growth. indeed, by blocking rules needed to make the economy run more smoothly, the bill could harm our economic prospects for years to come. and so i present to you a point of view of the republican leader of the house of representatives and a distinguished republican former chairman of the committee of science from 2001 to 2006. i now turn to ms. he shall auto of california -- eshoo of california, and i yield her as much time as she may desire. the chair: the gentlelady from california. ms. eshoo: mr. chairman, thank you, and to the distinguished ranking member and my friend, thank you for yielding time to me. i'm here today and i'm very troubled about this bill. instead of considering legislatio
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 53 (some duplicates have been removed)